Το να μαθαίνεις τα γεγονότα και να μπορείς να τα κρίνεις είναι άλλο στοιχείο και άλλο ο καθε ένας να τα εξηγεί όπως βολεύεται.

Περιδιαβαινοντας το διαδίκτυο έπεσα πάνω στην γνωστή σε όλους πλέον είδηση

Συρία – Ρωσσία – Αμερική = πόλεμος ;

Ο συντάκτης του άρθρου παρισφρείοντας τις προσωπικές του απόψεις μη λαμβανοντας υπόψη του ούτε το παρελθόν ούτε το παρόν αλλα πόσω δε μάλλον την κοινή λογική θέλει να μας πείσει όλους για το δίκιο του ..Ομως ευτυχώς το διαδίκτυο βρήθει στοιχείων που αν μη τι άλλω θέτουν ένα μεγάλο ερωτηματικό

Το άρθρο παρατίθεται ως έχει απο τον συγγραφέα του , τα λίνκ όμως αποδεικνύουν ότι το λιγότερο που μπορεί κάποιος να κάνει είναι ν αμφισβητήσει ή να βάλει ένα μεγάλο ερωτηματική για την αντικειμενικότητά του

The stakes in Syria now include US-Russia war

The stakes in Syria just jumped mighty high. Syrian troops attacked the anti-ISIS fighters we back. We warned them to knock it off. In reply, a Syrian aircraft struck our allies. An American jet shot it down.

Well dear sir as far as my memory can take me back to the Senator below

Mrs Clinton

Mr. Obama admits training

So do you really think, that those who fund and train ISIS ,are the ones that help the Anti ISIS ??

And that the Syrian Army who you claim you help are those that shot down the USA aircraft?

So ,by all means , do we have to believe that we deal with Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hayde? And if such a case which personality stands for which side and when ?

 

Now the Russian government says it will view as hostile any manned aircraft or drone flying west of the Euphrates River. That means us.

Well why do they have to mean you, since you are arguably state, that you are helping Syrian with Anti ISIS . Unless its not that case ..

Well lets see

If we go back in 9/11, where for many years wanted us to believe that the blame was to be given to the Bin Laden family (and whomever is with them) today we have from you a different perspective and clues, that show something different

Former FBI Chief

And George Bush

Lets also not forget

Were we to accept Russia’s ultimatum, we could not support our allies and we’d be shut out of the endgame battle with ISIS when, as Raqqa falls, the terrorists make a last stand at Deir ez-Zor (a city with a grim history: It was the end-station for Armenian genocide victims death-marched across the desert).

The technical wording of their threat allows the Russians a little bit of leeway, but what makes the pronouncement dangerous is that it’s public — making it hard for Vladimir Putin to back down. Of course, Putin’s a gambler, and a canny one. He may be bluffing. But we can’t count on it. We must assume his forces in Syria are already setting ambushes for our aviators.

Let me guess, this idea of Putin a gambler is concluded in what data? I presume it is based on

This kind of mentality ?

Or this one

For sure, either you dont have the slightest idea of who he may be, or you want the whole world to believe that he is a gambler based on your way of thinking and Hollywood Acting so far.

Lets not forget the way your society handled the Head of a country that admits it did not keep thy word . I remember that the meaning »Word of Honor» is highly ranked in your mentality and way of raising your children …right ?

So now who is the gambler ? who plays all these years with nations and peoples life?

Meanwhile, the Russian media, in a Big Lie mode excessive even by Moscow’s shameless standards, insist US troops on the ground are supporting ISIS, while the noble Syrian forces — alongside their selfless Russian and Iranian comrades — are the only ones fighting the terrorists.

Holly Mother the bad Russian are lying ? You don’t support ISIS ? well you mean that Mrs. Clinton is Lying ? And Obama ?

Lets play it again

And the Senator is lying i presume

and DIA also

Well so many liers and you still keep them? You haven’t sue them ?Well you must be a great liberal country where everyone even your officers can lie and no one gets hurt.

In reality, Bashar al-Assad and his backers cynically dumped the burden of wrecking ISIS on us and our local allies to concentrate on slaughtering civilians, exterminating freedom fighters and torturing thousands of prisoners to death. Now that we’ve done the anti-ISIS heavy lifting, they want to exclude us from the endgame and crush our Kurdish and Arab allies.

No!! you poor guys the world is against you except the Arabs who are also democrats as i remember and of course have nothing to do with ISIS finance and all the slaughtering

 

Russian media have also been giving a platform to Putin’s generals and their alarming tone. It doesn’t sound like the Cold War I remember. It sounds worse. Having won again and again over the past decade, from Georgia to Crimea and now Syria, Russia’s officer corps appears to be itching for a bout for the world championship, convinced we don’t have the guts to stand up to them.

Dear Sir you said Crimea .Well history shows that Crimea was given as a gift to you . What makes me wonder, is that since you declare yourself as fighters of freedom of speech, how come and people from Crimea never asked if wanted this deal?

But now that want to go back to Russia is illegal even to think about it ?

 

What’s wryly striking is that the Russians, who see themselves as master strategists, are blind to the way Iran has been manipulating them: Iran got us to fight ISIS and may get Putin to fight us. Guess who wins, either way?

This could spin out of control very, very fast. If it does, we have to win rapidly and decisively — and keep it within Syria.

The backstory: Recently, the focus of Iranian-backed Syrian ground operations shifted from heavily populated western and northern Syria to the east and southeast — above all, to the border with Iraq. On the Jordanian border, too, we’ve repeatedly had to strike Syrian troops and Iran-backed militias threatening enclaves and allies we protect.

Why are the Syrians suddenly confronting us? It’s Iran again.

The Iranians have deeper hooks in the Syrian conflict than any other foreign power. And they have a strategic design for regional hegemony. But Tehran’s vision of a new Persian empire depends on a land route from Iran, through Iraq and Syria, to Lebanon and the Mediterranean Sea. The recent shift in the fighting is meant to secure that advantage for Iran.

Well if such a case then why AIPAC stands infront of all and declare :

 

Recent, but hardly new. Iran’s Syria gambit is about controlling the ancient caravan routes that have gulped the blood of armies — and supported empires — for millennia.

We’re latecomers, just passing through, preceded by Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians, Alexander the Great, Romans, Arabs suddenly aflame with Islam, Crusaders (who came up short at Damascus), Mongols, Seljuk and Ottoman Turks. Those caravan “superhighways” are as strategically vital now as ever they were.

Maybe we shouldn’t have skipped History 101?

What happens now? Our military is war-gaming contingencies to ensure that, should the Russians fire on us, we’ll be prepared. We cannot let the Russians dictate where we fly and whom we can protect. We’ve gone out of our way to avoid confrontations with Putin’s war criminals, but there’s a limit. And we may be about to reach it.

This situation could become President Trump’s own Cuban Missile Crisis: If the Russians pull the trigger, will our president stand up to Putin?

Putin may be betting that he won’t.

 

I could go on for days, analyzing line by line, asking questions that don’t have an answer or have a different answer from what this article states. I maybe wrong but who is going to tell me that sir . Your people admit what you are trying to oppose ..So i think that you must rethink and talk again to each other so as to have the same route of speech . Maybe then someone is going to believe you at least.